CNA540_AT2_S1_2022

CNA540_AT2_S1_2022

Assessment Task 2: Essay

Criteria
Description
High Distinction (80-100%)
Distinction (70-79%)
Credit (60-69%)
Pass (50-59%)
Fail (0-49%)

Criterion 1

15 points

Integrate and compare evidenced based literature throughout to support the discussion.
·       Extensively integrated recent and relevant research literature throughout your discussion.

·       Cited a variety of high-level evidence and other scholarly source to support and substantiate key points and ideas

·       All concepts being supported with contemporary evidence

·       Very good integration of recent and credible research and literature to support your discussion and substantiate key points and ideas.

·       Many concepts are supported by contemporary evidence

·       Used a variety of scholarly sources.

·       Integrated some relevant references to support your discussion.

·       Utilised some credible sources, but scope for further integration of the literature.

·       Some concepts, are supported by contemporary evidence

 

·       Used minimal research and/or literature to support your discussion.

·       Alludes to a few concepts, some of which are well supported by contemporary evidence

·       Further evidence should have been utilised.

 

·       Used few   scholarly or no references to support your discussion.

·       No or minimal evidence of reading beyond the resources provided in the unit.

·       Concepts in the paper are not supported by evidence

 

Criterion 2

15 points

Critically analyse an appropriate topic related to contemporary cardiovascular nursing practice.
·       Demonstrates understanding of the selected issue by clearly analysing and examines all potential problems/nursing issues.

·       Topic is relevant to Cardiovascular nursing.

·       Demonstrates understanding by identifying and analysing most nursing issues.

·      Topic is relevant to Cardiovascular nursing.

·       Demonstrates understanding by identifying and analysing some nursing issues.

·       Topic has some relevance to Cardiovascular nursing.

·       Demonstrates understanding by identifying and describing some nursing issues

·       Topic has some relevance to Cardiovascular nursing.

 

·       Presents a case study.

·       Essay is inaccurate, does not contribute to understanding and/or is not clearly relevant to cardiovascular nursing.

Criterion 3

15 points

 

Reflect critically upon nursing practice related to the topic and propose recommendations for future practice
·       Strong links to the future implications and outcomes to own practice.

·       Provides recommendations for future practice.

·       Some examples of what has been learned with most linked to own practice

·       Provides some recommendations for future practice.

·       Reflects on own work practice but examples but links  are unclear

·       Provides few recommendations for future practice

·       Reflects on own work practice but does not provide examples, some errors noted

·       Provides few recommendations for future practice.

·       Does not reflect on own practice and no examples are given

·       Provides no recommendations for future practice.

Criterion 4

5 points

Writes clearly and succinctly in an appropriate academic structure with references using accurate Harvard Style.
·       Maintains all the academic standards by writing clearly and succinctly in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.

·       Usual referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to with no errors as per the Harvard referencing guide.

·       The paper is skilfully constructed and a pleasure to read.

·       Complies with required word count.

·       Mostly maintains an academic standard in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.

·       Usual referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to with minimal error.

·       Well written and complies with required word count.

·       Mostly maintains an academic standard in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.

·       Referencing, spelling, punctuation and/or grammar conventions are adhered to but there are some errors.

·       The layout and structure are satisfactory but there are sections which could improve.

·       Complies with required word count.

·       Need some improvement in Academic standards in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.

·       Have not demonstrated clear expression and unnecessary words are often used and paragraph or sentence structure is too repetitive.

·       Have demonstrated several spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.

·       Does not comply with required word count

·       Submitted work that is not in accordance with the required Presentation of Assignments.

·       Have demonstrated several spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors

·       The paper is difficult to read due to poor writing style, errors, and layout.

·       Does not comply with required word count.