Which of the following was the result on appeal in Iglesia Cristiana La Casa Del Senor, Inc., Etc. v. L.M., the case in the textbook involving the issue of whether a church was liable, pursuant to the doctrine of respondeat superior, for a sexual assault allegedly committed by a church pastor?

Which of the following was the result on appeal in Iglesia Cristiana La Casa Del Senor, Inc., Etc. v. L.M., the case in the textbook involving the issue of whether a church was liable, pursuant to the doctrine of respondeat superior, for a sexual assault allegedly committed by a church pastor?

A) The church was not liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior.

B) The church was not liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, but only because the pastor was immediately fired when his actions came to light.

C) The church was liable to the plaintiff under the doctrine of respondeat superior

D) The church was liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, but only if it could be proven that the pastor sexually assaulted more than one person.

E) The church was liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, but only if it could be proven that the church had knowledge of at least one sexual assault prior to the plaintiff’s but failed to remove the pastor from church assignments.