Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Project 3: Complex Features or Correlation

r presentation and need a sample draft to help me learn.

In Unit 3 we’ve been working in R to measure features that are more complex than word counts, looking at document-term frequencies and relationships among words. Accordingly, Project 3 will use these methods in R to ask a question about a text or a series of texts, finding new insights to which we otherwise wouldn’t have access.
For this third project, please choose a medium-to-long text (e.g., more than 2,000 words) or collection of texts (e.g., a collection of stories, poems, a collection of chapter, as long as it’s longer than 2,000 words) that you would like to study and use R to answer some non-obvious question about it. Unlike with previous projects, this report will be delivered as a presentation, so prepare slides with five of the six sections outlined in the guide to writing project reports (minus an abstract). The resulting presentation should be between 6 and 10 minutes long, and it should have at least ten slides with speaker notes. The report will be graded based on the rubric.
The question you choose to study might vary greatly in scope and specificity. In the same way you’ve chosen your own text or set of texts, you should also choose your own question to answer something that drives your interest. The options are broad, with two caveats:
Ask a question you haven’t asked before, about a text / set of texts you haven’t studied before.
Ask a question about a text that wasn’t directly worked through during one of the explanations offered by the instructor.
Here are some sample questions to give you some ideas, with parenthetical additions suggesting the kind of thing that would bear further consideration in the Discussion section of the report:
Romance novels share a lot of things in common, but they also show important differences. Using tf-idf, what are the words that distinguish mystery novels from each other, and how do these distinctions give insight into the topics being considered? (And in what ways can this information be more limiting than simply studying word frequencies?) Note: You might need to filter out character names for this approach to be insightful.
The Federalist Papers was an attempt to persuade 18th-century New Yorkers of the merits to be found in the proposed Constitution of the United States of America. Each of the 85 papers is written anonymously by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, or John Jay, who signed the letters with the shared pseudonym “Publius.” Using tf-idf, what can you identify as the distinguishing topics for all or some of these documents? (And what, if anything, can this approach reveal about the topic choices of one author?) Note: Since there’s so many, you might find it helpful to limit your consideration to a subset of papers, providing you’re still getting a large enough set of texts.
Consider the major individuals named in one of the two special counsel reports linked on Canvas. Which words are the most common words following, for instance, “the President,” Jones, Lewinsky, Currie, Jordan, or other individuals of interest in the Ken Starr report on President Clinton? Or which words are the most common words following “the President,” Cohen, Manafort, “Trump Jr.”, Flynn, or other individuals of interest in the Mueller report on President Trump? (And how does comparing these connections offer insight into the kinds of things most often said about these individuals?) Note: for some of these individuals, you’ll have to look at multiple words in a row, like “the President.”
Considering the writings on The Church on the Southern Black community, which words most commonly precede or follow a set of words you’re interested in? For instance, which words come before or after words related to an individual’s place in society (country, policy, government, society, citizens, etc.), or which words come before or after words related to significant topics of Christianity (God, grace, sin, forgive, etc.)? (And how do these connections allow us to understand the ways these writings differ among the different ideas shown by your analysis?)
What are the most common bigrams or trigrams of a text or set of texts that you’re interested in? (And what kinds of “distant reading” insights do they offer?)
Requirements: 10 slides with speaker notes
Project ReportsENG 375, Spring 2023Five times this semester, youÕll be asked to prepare reports on projects in text mining. Three times, the reports will be written. Twice, these reports will be presented as presentations using slides (as with PowerPoint or something similar).
These reports should follow a format that might be unfamiliar to you, with sections devoted to Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and References. To make things easier, it is recommended that you prepare the report in the following suggested order:
1.Go ahead and commit to paper the following two points. These will be used later when you prepare the Introduction section. (I suggest writing the Introduction section later.)
-the question you plan to answer -why this question is worth asking 2.Prepare the Methods section, setting out your plans for the work. Indicate the tools youÕll be using and the approaches youÕll be relying on with those tools. Explain the process in broad terms: for instance, you might say you divided a book so that each chapter has one text Þle before processing it, but you wouldnÕt need to explain that you did this by searching for the word ÒchapterÓ in order to Þnd where each chapter begins. Likewise, you might say you imported a particular Þle into your R environment, but you wouldnÕt need to say which functions you used to do so. (During this step, you should also do the work.)
3.Prepare the Results section, showing the data you found from doing the work. This part of the report is pretty dry, explaining what the results show, but it shouldnÕt yet interpret the results in terms of answering the question. This is also the stage where you should consider showing a chart or graphic of data, or potentially a table that summarizes the results. This section should not include an enormous table that is hard for readers to digest. If you must include a big table, save it for an appendix you add at the end of the report.
4.Prepare the Discussion section, connecting results to the question as a way of answering it. This section is also where you might comment on the studyÕs limitations, speculate on why you may have gotten these results, muse on the resultsÕ potential impact, outline future work based on what you found, or something else. End with a sense of conclusion.
5.Go back and Þnish the Introduction section. Remember to contextualize why your question is worth asking by making three movements:
a.Establishing the topic or territory.
b.Establishing the problem, gap, or question.
c.Indicating that your project solves the problem, Þlls in the gap, or answers the question, AND ALSO points out some impact of this problem that you are now, Þnally, solving.
6.Write the Abstract. Without repeating any sentence from the report, the abstract should offer about a 1Ð2 sentence summary of each section in a readable, standalone paragraph. Be sure to touch on each section:
-Introduction: What topic does the project study, and why?
-Methods: What tools and approaches were used?
-Results: What Þnding or which two Þndings seemed the most meaningful?
-Discussion: How do these results answer your question? What are the consequences?
7.Prepare a list of References to cite any sources you used.
-At a minimum, cite the texts.
-Also cite the tools (e.g., Voyant, RÉ) and packages (anything loaded using library()).
After each section is written, organize it into the following order:
1.Abstract
2.Introduction
3.Methods
4.Results
5.Discussion
6.References
Name: ___________________________________ENG 375 (Spring 2023) – Presentation Rubric – Project #_____Not meeting assignment guidelines may result in a penalty greater than the 10% typically awarded by that grading category.Needs WorkSatisfactoryExcellentScoreIntroduction and Purpose1ÑThe introduction neglects to contextualize the project, showing limited understanding of audience, or it is missing. The purpose of the project is unclear. As a result, the project lacks focus.3ÑIntroduction makes a good effort to contextualize the project but may assume too much of audience. The purpose of the project is clear, but it may be less compelling; alternatively, it asks a question with an obvious answer.4ÑIntroduction contextualizes the project concisely and intriguingly, showing good understanding of audience. The purpose of the project is clear and compelling, with a clear question that isnÕt readily obvious before study.Methods1ÑThe presentation shares almost none of the projectÕs methods in a way that is replicable.3ÑThe presentation shares most of the projectÕs methods, but some may be unclear, or they offer too much / too little detail. Replicability is not certain.5ÑSlides explain methods that are easy to follow. Where appropriate, some steps are summarized with less detail.Results1ÑPrinciple Þndings are lacking in major ways. Presentation may omit descriptions of results, visualizations, or tables of Þndings.3ÑResults and principle Þndings are lacking in a few key ways, whether in sufficient visualization, selection, or context, but they are otherwise satisfactory.5ÑThe presentation shares principle Þndings in a clear way, including selected visualizations, tables, and description.Discussion1ÑDiscussion is noticeably lacking in key ways, as in explanation or in connection to the projectÕs purpose.3ÑDiscussion leaves something more to be desired, neglecting to provide sufficient commentary, whether in logic or by leaving gaps of understanding.5ÑDiscussion provides commentary on the results, relating them clearly to the purpose of the project and answering any original questions.Clarity and Polish1ÑMany errors of grammar / spelling signiÞcantly detract. Slides need more polish in formatting or visualization.3ÑErrors of grammar /spelling occasionally detract from clarity. Slides are otherwise polished, with good formatting, visualizations, and referencing.4ÑGrammar and spelling are Þne, with few or no errors. Slides are attractive, with compelling visualizations and authoritative referencing.Presentation and Respon-siveness1ÑPresentation was lacking in preparation, or presenter was unable to explain the work. Most of the presentation was read from slides.3ÑProject was presented well, and presenter responded mostly well to questions, with only slight hesitation or uncertainty. Slides were supplement or outline to the presentation, which went into greater detail.4ÑPresentation showed excellent preparation. Responses to questions showed impressive understanding of material. Slides were supplement or outline, illustrating and providing clarity rather than than repeating content.Presentation Guidelines Scale: 26–30 = A ≈ 90-100% 21–25 = B ≈ 80-89 % 14–20 = C ≈ 70–79 % 8–13 = D ≈ 60–69 %3ÑSatisÞes all expectations of topic, length, methodology, and originality.%

The post Project 3: Complex Features or Correlation first appeared on Bessays.

GET FREE HOMEWORK HELP TODAY

X
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?