✍️ Get Writing Help
Uncategorized

NURS-6512N-48 Week 9: Assignment 1

NURS-6512N-48 Week 9: Assignment 1 CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT: ASSESSING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS

NURS-6512N-48 Week 9: Assignment 1 CASE STUDY ASSIGNMENT: ASSESSING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS

Rubric

NURS_6512_Week_9_Assignment1_Rubric
NURS_6512_Week_9_Assignment1_Rubric

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeUsing the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template: · Create documentation or an episodic/focused note in SOAP format about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned. ·  Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for your case.

50 to >44.0 Pts

Excellent
The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response thoroughly and accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.

44 to >38.0 Pts

Good
The response accurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.

38 to >32.0 Pts

Fair
The response follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. The response provides evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness or inaccuracy in the evidence selected.

32 to >0 Pts

Poor
The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, and/or missing evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.
50 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcome·   List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each.

35 to >29.0 Pts

Excellent
The response lists five distinctly different and detailed possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study and provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the five conditions selected.

29 to >23.0 Pts

Good
The response lists four to five different possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study and provides an accurate justification for each of the five conditions selected.

23 to >17.0 Pts

Fair
The response lists three to four possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and/or some inaccuracy in the conditions and/or justification for each.

17 to >0 Pts

Poor
The response lists three or fewer, or is missing, possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with inaccurate or missing justification for each condition selected.
35 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 Pts

Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 Pts

Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 Pts

Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 Pts

Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 Pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 Pts

Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 Pts

Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 Pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 Pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 Pts

Good
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 Pts

Fair
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 Pts

Poor
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total points: 100

 

 

The post NURS-6512N-48 Week 9: Assignment 1 appeared first on Masterly Nursing Papers.

admin

Expert academic writer and education specialist helping students in the UK, USA, and Australia achieve their best results.

Need help with your own assignment?

Our expert writers can help you apply everything you've just read — to your actual assignment.

Get Expert Help Now →
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?