E-Journals Peered Review

Reccomended Reading – Week 11

Essential Reading for Week 11

E-Book

Varvouzou, I (2012), Capital Market Anomalies: Explained by human´s irrationality: Explained by human´s irrationality, Diplomica Verlag, Hamburg. Available from: ProQuest Ebook Central. (Chapters 1, 2 and 3)

E-Journals Peered Review

List, J.A. 2011, “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies? The Case of Exogenous Market Experience”, The American Economic Review, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 313-317. 

Kamstra, M.J., Kramer, L.A. & Levi, M.D. (2000), “Losing sleep at the market: The daylight saving anomaly”, The American Economic Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1005-1011.

If you have the time, go through the extra suggested reading material listed below available in ProQuest Online Library:

1. Efficient market hypothesis: Is the stock market efficient? (2018). . New York: Newstex. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/blogs,-podcasts,-websites/efficient-markethypothesis-is stock/docview/2251311039/se-2?accountid=188730

2. Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59-82. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarlyjournals/efficient market-hypothesis-critics/docview/212078291/se-2?accountid=188730

3. Alajbeg, D., PhD., Bubas, Z., PhD., & Sonje, V., M.B.A. (2012). The efficient market hypothesis: Problems with interpretations of empirical tests. Financial Theory and Practice, 36(1), 53-72. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/efficient-market-hypothesisproblems-with/docview/1017670799/se-2?accountid=188730

4. Farley, D. E. (2000). Achieving a balance between risk and return. Healthcare Financial Management, 54(6), 54-8. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/achievingbalance-between-risk-return/docview/196361895/se-2?accountid=188730

*All the above are available through ProQuest

Last modified: Thursday, 13 May 2021, 9:49 AM