QUESTION 1 1. Civil causes of action in Negligence and Battery both require proo

QUESTION 1
1. Civil
causes of action in Negligence and Battery both require proof of intent.

true

false

QUESTION 2
1. Strict
Liability

does
not apply to someone who exercises reasonable care.

does
not account for fault.

holds
persons liable who engage in retail fraud.

none
of the above.

QUESTION 3
1. The
“breach of duty” element required in a Negligence action, is measured
by a “reasonable person” standard.

true

false

QUESTION 4
1. To
recover under a third party claim for negligent infliction of emotional
distress, a plaintiff does not have to establish a showing of physical symptons
resulting from the emotional distress.

true

false

QUESTION 5
1. Tort
reform measures

have
been rejected in most States in the U.S.

will
mandate a removal of proximate cause as an element in an action for
Negligence.

include
limits on the amount of damages a plaintiff can recover for pain and
suffering and emotional distress.

have
been ruled to be in violation of the U.S. Constitution.

QUESTION 6
1. For a
Public Figure to sue for defamation, the Public Figure must show

actual
malice.

misuse
of privilege.

violation
of a statute.

none
of the above.

QUESTION
7
1. The
civil tort of Assault requires

intentional
touching.

damages
that exceed 1000 dollars.

apprehension
of immediate battery.

loss
of mobility suffered by the plaintiff.

QUESTION 8
1. The
difference between conversion and trespass to personal property is that

trespass
to personal property does not require intent, while conversion does require
intent.

trespass
to personal property is based upon temporary interference with another’s
personal property, while conversion is based upon dominion and control over
another’s personal property.

consent
is not a defense to trespass to property, while consent is a defense to
conversion.

in
order to be liable for conversion the tortfeasor must be at least 25 years of
age, while liability for trespass to personal property has no such age
requirement.

QUESTION 9
1. The
plaintiff’s burden of proof in a civil tort case is identical to that of a
criminal case.

true

false

QUESTION 10
1. The US
Supreme Court has required that actual malice must be proved when

public
officials sue the media for false and defamatory statements.

public
officials are found strictly liable for a crime.

famous
people sue for battery.

famous
people or elected officials sue for trespass to land.

QUESTION 11
1. Of the
following four choices, the best explanation of Proximate Cause in Negligence
is

Proximate
Cause is defined as any breached duty which has been established in a
Negligence case.

Proximate
Cause is an element in Strict Liability.

Proximate
Cause is no longer required in a cause of action in Negligence and is now
required in any Intentional Tort cause of action.

Proximate
Cause is defined as a device used by Judges to cut off liability when the
injuries seem too remote from the negligent act to be fair to hold the
defendant liable for the injuries.

QUESTION 12
1. Compensatory
Damages are also known as

actual
damages.

punative
damages.

consequential
damages.

none
of tha above.

QUESTION 13
1. Tim
takes a shortcut across John’s yard on the way to school. John gave Tim
permission to use John’s yard as a shortcut. Tim has trespassed on John’s
property.

true

false

QUESTION 14
1. Harry
negligently imperils Sally. Sarah comes to the aid of Sally. Sarah breaks her
arm during the reasonable attempt to rescue Sally. Harry is liable to

Sally
only.

Sarah
only.

both
Sally and Sarah.

neither
Sally nor Sarah.

QUESTION 15
1. Freddie
works the late night shift at a convenience store. The store has been robbed
several times. One night Freddie discovered that the “emergency
alert” alarm system was not working properly inside the store. Freddie
notified the owner that the system was faulty. The owner told Freddie that the
system would be fixed promptly. Before the system was fixed, the store was
robbed again. The robber assaulted Freddie during the robbery resulting in
Freddie suffering a broken foot. Under this set of facts, Freddie may

only
recover from the robber.

recover
from the store owner if Freddie can show that his broken foot was a
forseeable harm based upon the facts.

recover
under the doctrine of Strict Liability with a limit of 1000 dollars for the
foot injury.

recover
only punitive damages.

QUESTION 16
1. Consent
is a defense to Tort if the consent is freely given.

true

false

QUESTION 17
1. The
defendant must actually touch the plaintiff’s body to be liable for battery.

true

false

QUESTION 18
1. A
defendant’s actions must be outrageous in order to be found liable of
intentional infliction of emotional distress.

true

false

QUESTION 19
1. The
following is not an element required in a Negligence action.

intent

proximate
cause

establishment
of a duty

breach
of an established duty

QUESTION 20
1. In
order to keep Pat from leaving the house, Chris locked the front door, but did
not lock the back door. Chris has falsely imprisoned Pat.

true

false

QUESTION 21
1. People
can be liable for trespass to land even if they believe that the land is their
own.

true

false

QUESTION 22
1. Third
parties are not entitled to recover for emotional distress resulting from
witnessing harm caused to another person by a defendant’s acts.

true

false

QUESTION 23
1. Excited
by receiving an “A” on her Business Law examination, Wilma drives in
an out of control manner on a dirt road on her way home from school. Wilma
exceeds the speed limit by a signifigant amount and does “figure 8’s”
down the dirt road. While driving, Wilma strikes a Driver Farmer who has an
unusually “thin skull.” The Driver Farmer head hits his windshield
and he dies. Under the same set of facts, had the Driver Farmer had a
“normal skull”, the Driver Farmer would have survived without any
injury. With the “thin skull” fact pattern in place, Wilma

is
liable for the Driver Farmer’s death.

is
liable for the violation of the speed limit but not for the Driver Farmer’s
death.

is
liable for nothing, because if the Driver Farmer had a “normal
skull” the injuries would not have resulted.

is
liable only for any damage to the Driver Farmer’s vehicle.

QUESTION 24
1. Ropey
voluntarily goes for a ride with Dopey. Dopey is drunk and Ropey knows of
Dopey’s condition. A court would regard Ropey’s action as

ultrahazardous.

assumption
of the risk.

recklessness.

proximately
related.

QUESTION 25
1. The
following is a defense to a strict liability offense

assumption
of the risk

contributory
negligence

a
showing that the defendant engaged in a rescue attempt

all
of the above

QUESTION 26
1. In
actions for malicious prosecution and for wrongful use of civil proceedings, a
plaintiff must show that

some
sort of widespread dissemination of information is necessary for liability.

true,
but private facts, about a person can be an invasion of privacy.

truth
is not a defense to “publication of private facts.”

none
of the above.

QUESTION 27
1. Lani is
upset with her roommate Pani because Pani refuses to clean up the room. In a
fit of rage, Lani tries to hit Pani with a dirty towel, but misses. At the time
of the attempt, Pani had turned around and was facing the opposite direction
and did not react to the attempt. On this set of facts

Lani
is liable for Battery.

Lani
is liable for Assault.

Lani
is liable for neither Assault nor Battery.

Lani
is liable for Defamation.

QUESTION 28
1. The
tort of False Imprisonment protects

physical
interests.

mental
interests.

both
physical and mental interests.

neither
physical nor mental interests.

QUESTION 29
1. Seth
was shopping at a local music store looking for an obscure CD. While searching
for the CD, he remembered that he had an appointment with his Accounting
Professor and pulled a calendar out of his pocket only to discover that he was
already late for the appointment. Seth quickly put the calendar back into his
backpack and ran out of the store. As he exited the store, the security guard
stopped Seth and asked that he accompany the guard to the office in the back of
the store. Seth consented. Once there, the guard accused Seth of shoplifting
the CD. The guard quickly searched Seth’s backpack and found nothing. The guard
apologized to Seth. The incident in the back office took 5 minutes. Under this
set of facts

Seth
will be sucessful in a false imprisonment tort suit against the store.

Seth
will be sucessful in a conversion tort suit against the store.

the
store is likely protected by the conditional shopkeeper’s privilege as a
defense to a false imprisonment tort suit.

Seth
will be sucessful in a defamation tort suit against the store.

QUESTION 30
1. Which
of the following is NOT one of the basic principles of causation?

Defendants
take their victims as they find the victims.

Negligence
invites rescue.

Victims
invite negligence.

Both
a and b.

QUESTION 31
1. Most
States in the U.S. have abandoned a comparative negligence system and replaced
it with a contributory negligence system.

true

false

QUESTION 32
1. The
Tort of Interference with Contract

seeks
to preserve the sanctity of private contractual relatinships.

applies
to a person who intentionally induces another to breach a contract.

applies
to a person who intentionally prevents performance of another person’s
contract.

all
of the above.

QUESTION 33
1. To
recover, a plaintiff in a Negligence suit must prove

that
the defendant had a duty and that the defendant breached that duty.

that
the defendant’s breach of the established duty was the proximate cause of the
plaintiff’s injury.

that
the plaintiff’s injury was of a severe nature.

a
and b but not c.

QUESTION 34
1. Under a
pure comparative negligence system, plaintiffs

who
fail to exercise reasonable care are not able to recover.

are
able to recover the portion of their loss not attributable to their fault.

are
barred from any recovery.

are
able to recover any loss that exceeds 50% of the value of the medical bills.

QUESTION 35
1. The
Tort of Disparagement

requires
proof of actual damages.

covers
true statements about the personal behavior of persons engaged in a business
organization.

is
identical to the Tort of Slander.

none
of the above.

QUESTION 36
1. Under a
straight Comparative Negligence System, Chester is found to be 40% negligent.
Which of the following is true.

Chester
could recover only 40% of his damages.

Chester
could recover only 60% of his damages.

Chester
could recover 100% of his damages.

Chester
will recover 0% of his damages.

QUESTION 37
1. The
Fifth Amendment’s prohibition against double jeopardy prevents a person from
being tried in both civil and criminal trials for the same action.

true

false

QUESTION 38
1. Debtor
owes Creditor 500 hundred dollars. which is more than a year overdue. Creditor,
while at a party, blurted out to everyone at the party that Debtor owed the 500
hundred dollars and that the debt was over one year overdue. Can Debtor recover
from Creditor in a suit for defamation?

Yes
– because Creditor abuse the conditional privilege.

No
– because Creditor has a defense of Truth.

Yes
– because Creditor published the statement at a social gathering to more than
5 persons.

No
– because statements regarding the payment of debts are exempted from any
liability under a defamation suit.

2 points
QUESTION 39
1. While
fishing on the lake, Float anchored his boat, left the keys in the ignition,
and went to his car to retrieve a fishing lure. During the time that the boat
was anchored, Punk stole the boat and began recklessly driving the boat across
the lake. During the trip across the lake, Punk hit another fishing boat which
resulted in an injury to the occupant of the other fishing boat. Select the
true statement.

Float
is not liable because Float was not in control of the anchored boat during
the time that the “other boat” was hit.

If
it was reasonable forseeeable that someone would steal a boat with the keys
left in the ignition, Float would be liable for the injuries to the occupant
of the “other boat.”

The
act of Punk stealing the boat will absolve Float of any liability for
injuries to the occupant of the “other boat.”

This
is an unforseeable accident and as such there exists no liability for the
reckless driving exhibited by Punk or the leaving of the keys in the ignition
by Float.

QUESTION 40
1. Assault
is an intentional nonconsensual touching that is harmful or offensive.

true

false

QUESTION 41
1. Larry
Loud is a popular talk show host who likes to take a confrontational approach
to interviewing his guests. Larry is a smoker and invites Alice, a well known
anti-smoking advocate, to be on his show. During the course of the interview,
Larry attempts to demonstrate the harmless effects of second hand smoke by
blowing smoke into the face of Alice. Based upon this set of facts

Larry
would be liable for Battery.

Larry
would not be liable for Battery because the smoke did not directly touch the
body of Alice.

Larry
would be liable for False Imprisonment.

QUESTION 42
1. Under
the doctrine of Strict Liability, a showing of care and caution will mitigate
the defendant’s liability.

true

false

QUESTION 43
1. Under a
Strict Liability system, the following acts would be considered
ultra-hazardous.

keeping
wild animals

using
explosives

transporting
gasoline on the Interstate Road

all
of the above.

QUESTION 44
1. A
negligent person is liable for all harms resulting from the negligent act.

true

false

QUESTION 45
1. The
Doctrine of “Last Clear Chance”

holds
that even though the plaintiff was negligent, the plaintiff can still recover
if it can be shown that the defendant had the last opportunity to avoid the
harm.

has
been recently abandoned by many States in favor of a comparative negligence system.

was
a response to the severity of the doctrine of contributory negligence.

all
of the above.

QUESTION 46
1. In
cases of slander per se, defendants are liable even if the statements they
uttered were true.

true

false

QUESTION 47
1. Punitive
Damages are

small
monetary damages awarded to show technical guilt.

designed
to award the defendant for commencing the legal action.

damages
in excess of the plaintiff’s injuries, awarded to punish the defendant.

damages
awarded in the plaintiff’s favor but never paid by the defendant.

QUESTION 48
1. The
following is a defense to Recklessness.

unreasonable
danger

assumption
of the risk

consent

none
of the above.

QUESTION 49
1. Ultrahazardous
activities

are
defined by statute.

only
create liability where the defendant fails to act in a reasonable manner.

give
rise to strict liability.

only
create liability where the activity has been outlawed by statutory authority.

QUESTION 50
1. One can
commit an intentional tort without the conscious desire to cause harm or
without the knowledge that harm is substantially certain to result.

true

false

QUESTION 11. Civil
causes of action in Negligence and Battery both require proof of intent.truefalseQUESTION 21. Strict
Liabilitydoes
not apply to someone who exercises reasonable care.does
not account for fault.holds
persons liable who engage in retail fraud.none
of the above.QUESTION 31. The
“breach of duty” element required in a Negligence action, is measured
by a “reasonable person” standard.truefalseQUESTION 41. To
recover under a third party claim for negligent infliction of emotional
distress, a plaintiff does not have to establish a showing of physical symptons
resulting from the emotional distress.truefalseQUESTION 51. Tort
reform measureshave
been rejected in most States in the U.S.will
mandate a removal of proximate cause as an element in an action for
Negligence.include
limits on the amount of damages a plaintiff can recover for pain and
suffering and emotional distress.have
been ruled to be in violation of the U.S. Constitution.QUESTION 61. For a
Public Figure to sue for defamation, the Public Figure must showactual
malice.misuse
of privilege.violation
of a statute.none
of the above.QUESTION
71. The
civil tort of Assault requiresintentional
touching.damages
that exceed 1000 dollars.apprehension
of immediate battery.loss
of mobility suffered by the plaintiff.QUESTION 81. The
difference between conversion and trespass to personal property is thattrespass
to personal property does not require intent, while conversion does require
intent.trespass
to personal property is based upon temporary interference with another’s
personal property, while conversion is based upon dominion and control over
another’s personal property.consent
is not a defense to trespass to property, while consent is a defense to
conversion.in
order to be liable for conversion the tortfeasor must be at least 25 years of
age, while liability for trespass to personal property has no such age
requirement.QUESTION 91. The
plaintiff’s burden of proof in a civil tort case is identical to that of a
criminal case.truefalseQUESTION 101. The US
Supreme Court has required that actual malice must be proved whenpublic
officials sue the media for false and defamatory statements.public
officials are found strictly liable for a crime.famous
people sue for battery.famous
people or elected officials sue for trespass to land.QUESTION 111. Of the
following four choices, the best explanation of Proximate Cause in Negligence
isProximate
Cause is defined as any breached duty which has been established in a
Negligence case.Proximate
Cause is an element in Strict Liability.Proximate
Cause is no longer required in a cause of action in Negligence and is now
required in any Intentional Tort cause of action.Proximate
Cause is defined as a device used by Judges to cut off liability when the
injuries seem too remote from the negligent act to be fair to hold the
defendant liable for the injuries.QUESTION 121. Compensatory
Damages are also known asactual
damages.punative
damages.consequential
damages.none
of tha above.QUESTION 131. Tim
takes a shortcut across John’s yard on the way to school. John gave Tim
permission to use John’s yard as a shortcut. Tim has trespassed on John’s
property.truefalseQUESTION 141. Harry
negligently imperils Sally. Sarah comes to the aid of Sally. Sarah breaks her
arm during the reasonable attempt to rescue Sally. Harry is liable toSally
only.Sarah
only.both
Sally and Sarah.neither
Sally nor Sarah.QUESTION 151. Freddie
works the late night shift at a convenience store. The store has been robbed
several times. One night Freddie discovered that the “emergency
alert” alarm system was not working properly inside the store. Freddie
notified the owner that the system was faulty. The owner told Freddie that the
system would be fixed promptly. Before the system was fixed, the store was
robbed again. The robber assaulted Freddie during the robbery resulting in
Freddie suffering a broken foot. Under this set of facts, Freddie mayonly
recover from the robber.recover
from the store owner if Freddie can show that his broken foot was a
forseeable harm based upon the facts.recover
under the doctrine of Strict Liability with a limit of 1000 dollars for the
foot injury.recover
only punitive damages.QUESTION 161. Consent
is a defense to Tort if the consent is freely given.truefalseQUESTION 171. The
defendant must actually touch the plaintiff’s body to be liable for battery.truefalseQUESTION 181. A
defendant’s actions must be outrageous in order to be found liable of
intentional infliction of emotional distress.truefalseQUESTION 191. The
following is not an element required in a Negligence action.intentproximate
causeestablishment
of a dutybreach
of an established dutyQUESTION 201. In
order to keep Pat from leaving the house, Chris locked the front door, but did
not lock the back door. Chris has falsely imprisoned Pat.truefalseQUESTION 211. People
can be liable for trespass to land even if they believe that the land is their
own.truefalseQUESTION 221. Third
parties are not entitled to recover for emotional distress resulting from
witnessing harm caused to another person by a defendant’s acts.truefalseQUESTION 231. Excited
by receiving an “A” on her Business Law examination, Wilma drives in
an out of control manner on a dirt road on her way home from school. Wilma
exceeds the speed limit by a signifigant amount and does “figure 8’s”
down the dirt road. While driving, Wilma strikes a Driver Farmer who has an
unusually “thin skull.” The Driver Farmer head hits his windshield
and he dies. Under the same set of facts, had the Driver Farmer had a
“normal skull”, the Driver Farmer would have survived without any
injury. With the “thin skull” fact pattern in place, Wilmais
liable for the Driver Farmer’s death.is
liable for the violation of the speed limit but not for the Driver Farmer’s
death.is
liable for nothing, because if the Driver Farmer had a “normal
skull” the injuries would not have resulted.is
liable only for any damage to the Driver Farmer’s vehicle.QUESTION 241. Ropey
voluntarily goes for a ride with Dopey. Dopey is drunk and Ropey knows of
Dopey’s condition. A court would regard Ropey’s action asultrahazardous.assumption
of the risk.recklessness.proximately
related.QUESTION 251. The
following is a defense to a strict liability offenseassumption
of the riskcontributory
negligencea
showing that the defendant engaged in a rescue attemptall
of the aboveQUESTION 261. In
actions for malicious prosecution and for wrongful use of civil proceedings, a
plaintiff must show thatsome
sort of widespread dissemination of information is necessary for liability.true,
but private facts, about a person can be an invasion of privacy.truth
is not a defense to “publication of private facts.”none
of the above.QUESTION 271. Lani is
upset with her roommate Pani because Pani refuses to clean up the room. In a
fit of rage, Lani tries to hit Pani with a dirty towel, but misses. At the time
of the attempt, Pani had turned around and was facing the opposite direction
and did not react to the attempt. On this set of factsLani
is liable for Battery.Lani
is liable for Assault.Lani
is liable for neither Assault nor Battery.Lani
is liable for Defamation.QUESTION 281. The
tort of False Imprisonment protectsphysical
interests.mental
interests.both
physical and mental interests.neither
physical nor mental interests.QUESTION 291. Seth
was shopping at a local music store looking for an obscure CD. While searching
for the CD, he remembered that he had an appointment with his Accounting
Professor and pulled a calendar out of his pocket only to discover that he was
already late for the appointment. Seth quickly put the calendar back into his
backpack and ran out of the store. As he exited the store, the security guard
stopped Seth and asked that he accompany the guard to the office in the back of
the store. Seth consented. Once there, the guard accused Seth of shoplifting
the CD. The guard quickly searched Seth’s backpack and found nothing. The guard
apologized to Seth. The incident in the back office took 5 minutes. Under this
set of factsSeth
will be sucessful in a false imprisonment tort suit against the store.Seth
will be sucessful in a conversion tort suit against the store.the
store is likely protected by the conditional shopkeeper’s privilege as a
defense to a false imprisonment tort suit.Seth
will be sucessful in a defamation tort suit against the store.QUESTION 301. Which
of the following is NOT one of the basic principles of causation?Defendants
take their victims as they find the victims.Negligence
invites rescue.Victims
invite negligence.Both
a and b.QUESTION 311. Most
States in the U.S. have abandoned a comparative negligence system and replaced
it with a contributory negligence system.truefalseQUESTION 321. The
Tort of Interference with Contractseeks
to preserve the sanctity of private contractual relatinships.applies
to a person who intentionally induces another to breach a contract.applies
to a person who intentionally prevents performance of another person’s
contract.all
of the above.QUESTION 331. To
recover, a plaintiff in a Negligence suit must provethat
the defendant had a duty and that the defendant breached that duty.that
the defendant’s breach of the established duty was the proximate cause of the
plaintiff’s injury.that
the plaintiff’s injury was of a severe nature.a
and b but not c.QUESTION 341. Under a
pure comparative negligence system, plaintiffswho
fail to exercise reasonable care are not able to recover.are
able to recover the portion of their loss not attributable to their fault.are
barred from any recovery.are
able to recover any loss that exceeds 50% of the value of the medical bills.QUESTION 351. The
Tort of Disparagementrequires
proof of actual damages.covers
true statements about the personal behavior of persons engaged in a business
organization.is
identical to the Tort of Slander.none
of the above.QUESTION 361. Under a
straight Comparative Negligence System, Chester is found to be 40% negligent.
Which of the following is true.Chester
could recover only 40% of his damages.Chester
could recover only 60% of his damages.Chester
could recover 100% of his damages.Chester
will recover 0% of his damages.QUESTION 371. The
Fifth Amendment’s prohibition against double jeopardy prevents a person from
being tried in both civil and criminal trials for the same action.truefalseQUESTION 381. Debtor
owes Creditor 500 hundred dollars. which is more than a year overdue. Creditor,
while at a party, blurted out to everyone at the party that Debtor owed the 500
hundred dollars and that the debt was over one year overdue. Can Debtor recover
from Creditor in a suit for defamation?Yes
– because Creditor abuse the conditional privilege.No
– because Creditor has a defense of Truth.Yes
– because Creditor published the statement at a social gathering to more than
5 persons.No
– because statements regarding the payment of debts are exempted from any
liability under a defamation suit.2 points QUESTION 391. While
fishing on the lake, Float anchored his boat, left the keys in the ignition,
and went to his car to retrieve a fishing lure. During the time that the boat
was anchored, Punk stole the boat and began recklessly driving the boat across
the lake. During the trip across the lake, Punk hit another fishing boat which
resulted in an injury to the occupant of the other fishing boat. Select the
true statement.Float
is not liable because Float was not in control of the anchored boat during
the time that the “other boat” was hit.If
it was reasonable forseeeable that someone would steal a boat with the keys
left in the ignition, Float would be liable for the injuries to the occupant
of the “other boat.”The
act of Punk stealing the boat will absolve Float of any liability for
injuries to the occupant of the “other boat.”This
is an unforseeable accident and as such there exists no liability for the
reckless driving exhibited by Punk or the leaving of the keys in the ignition
by Float.QUESTION 401. Assault
is an intentional nonconsensual touching that is harmful or offensive.truefalseQUESTION 411. Larry
Loud is a popular talk show host who likes to take a confrontational approach
to interviewing his guests. Larry is a smoker and invites Alice, a well known
anti-smoking advocate, to be on his show. During the course of the interview,
Larry attempts to demonstrate the harmless effects of second hand smoke by
blowing smoke into the face of Alice. Based upon this set of factsLarry
would be liable for Battery.Larry
would not be liable for Battery because the smoke did not directly touch the
body of Alice.Larry
would be liable for False Imprisonment.QUESTION 421. Under
the doctrine of Strict Liability, a showing of care and caution will mitigate
the defendant’s liability.truefalseQUESTION 431. Under a
Strict Liability system, the following acts would be considered
ultra-hazardous.keeping
wild animalsusing
explosivestransporting
gasoline on the Interstate Roadall
of the above.QUESTION 441. A
negligent person is liable for all harms resulting from the negligent act.truefalseQUESTION 451. The
Doctrine of “Last Clear Chance”holds
that even though the plaintiff was negligent, the plaintiff can still recover
if it can be shown that the defendant had the last opportunity to avoid the
harm.has
been recently abandoned by many States in favor of a comparative negligence system.was
a response to the severity of the doctrine of contributory negligence.all
of the above.QUESTION 461. In
cases of slander per se, defendants are liable even if the statements they
uttered were true.truefalseQUESTION 471. Punitive
Damages aresmall
monetary damages awarded to show technical guilt.designed
to award the defendant for commencing the legal action.damages
in excess of the plaintiff’s injuries, awarded to punish the defendant.damages
awarded in the plaintiff’s favor but never paid by the defendant.QUESTION 481. The
following is a defense to Recklessness.unreasonable
dangerassumption
of the riskconsentnone
of the above.QUESTION 491. Ultrahazardous
activitiesare
defined by statute.only
create liability where the defendant fails to act in a reasonable manner.give
rise to strict liability.only
create liability where the activity has been outlawed by statutory authority.QUESTION 501. One can
commit an intentional tort without the conscious desire to cause harm or
without the knowledge that harm is substantially certain to result.truefalse

The post QUESTION 1
1. Civil
causes of action in Negligence and Battery both require proo appeared first on Destiny Papers.