Critical thinking, reasoning, and evaluation of evidence

Critical thinking, reasoning, and evaluation of evidence
(35 marks) A critical analysis and presentation of the case study with precise links between the details and care provided aligning with the principles of palliative care practice is formulated.
29.1 – 35
23.2 – 29
An applicable clinical practice guideline is selected supporting an excellent critique of the case study. Excellent identification of limitations, omissions and/or inaccuracies of care supported by contemporary credible literature and the selected Clinical Practice Guideline.
An applicable clinical practice guideline is selected supporting a very good critique of the case study. Very good identification of limitations, omissions and/or inaccuracies of care supported by contemporary credible literature and the selected Clinical Practice Guideline on most occasions.
An aF practi selec good case. Good limitat and/ol of can some credib the se. Practic some I occasil
Sources and Referencing (10 Marks)
8.5 – 10
7.5 – 8.4
Credible and relevant references are used comprehensively. Accurate use of APA 7 referencing style in all instances. A range of in-text citations has been used comprehensively.

Credible and relevant references are used clearly. Accurate use of APA 7 referencing style on most occasions. A range of in-text citations has been used clearly.
Credibl referen sounA Accurai 7 refers most oc A range citations used so
Mechanics (Grammar, Spelling and Punctuation) (5 Marks)
4.25 –
4.2 – 3
3.
There are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, the meaning is easily discernible. The critique reads without interruption.
There are minimal errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, andhe meaning is easily discernible.
There ar errors wi spelling punctuat meaning discernib