Preview Rubric

9/3/22, 5:19 PM Preview Rubric: Assessment 2B: Presentation – (BEO5307) Global Procurement – CT,SY – Victoria University
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1413219&rubricId=500141&originTool=quicklinks 1/5
Preview Rubric

Assessment 2B: Present
Criterion
10.1
Content
5 points
ation

Print Rubric
/ 5
4.3 points
Covers all
aspects of the
topic, includes
illustrative
examples
Discipline
specific terms
are well
defined and
used
appropriately
(3.5 – 4.95
points)

3 points
Includes most
essential
information
and some
supporting
details
Discipline
specific terms
are defined
and mostly
used
appropriately
(2.5 – 3.45
points)

1.3 points
Includes some
essential
information
with critical
details
missing.
Inconsistent
use and
application of
discipline
specific
language
(0 – 2.45
points)

(BEO5307) Global Procurement – CT,SY
Assessment 2B: Presentation
Course: (BEO5307) Global Procurement – CT,SY

Criteria
Full Marks
High
Distinction/Disti
nction (70-
100%)

Credit/Pass (50-
69%)

N (Not yet
satisfactory) (0-
49%)

Criterion Score

9/3/22, 5:19 PM Preview Rubric: Assessment 2B: Presentation – (BEO5307) Global Procurement – CT,SY – Victoria University
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1413219&rubricId=500141&originTool=quicklinks 2/5

Criteria
Full Marks
High
Distinction/Disti
nction (70-
100%)

Credit/Pass (50-
69%)

N (Not yet
satisfactory) (0-
49%)

Criterion Score

 

Criterion
10.2
Organisation
, clarity of
argument,
and
justification
5 points

/ 5
4.3 points
Organisation
of information
is clear and
consistent
with
appropriately
sequenced
transitions
between
sections
Justification of
conclusion/
recommendati
ons based on
valid
interpretations
of material
presented
(3.5 – 4.95
points)

3 points
Organisation
of information
is mostly clear
and
appropriately
sequenced
with an
introduction
and
conclusion.
Reasoning
behind
conclusion/
recommendati
ons
occasionally
weak.
(2.5 – 3.45
points)

1.3 points
Limited
attempt at
organising
information in
a coherent
order.
Reasoning
behind
conclusion/
recommendati
ons un-clear
and/or
incomplete.
(0 – 2.45
points)

Criterion
10.3
Delivery,
engagement
with
audience,
and time
management

/ 5
5 points
4.3 points
Clear, strong
voice (i.e. all
audience
members hear
the
presentation)
with a variety
of inflections
usually
emphasising
key messages.
Fluent
argument

3 points
Mostly clear,
audible voice
(i.e. most
audience
members hear
the
presentation),
occasionally
delivered at a
distracting
pace (i.e. too
slow or too
quick) and/or
monotone

1.3 points
Quiet voice or
pronunciation
often
indistinct. (i.e.
audience
members at
the back of
the room have
difficulty
hearing the
presentation).
Little evidence
of attempts to
persuade the

9/3/22, 5:19 PM Preview Rubric: Assessment 2B: Presentation – (BEO5307) Global Procurement – CT,SY – Victoria University
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1413219&rubricId=500141&originTool=quicklinks 3/5

Criteria
Full Marks
High
Distinction/Disti
nction (70-
100%)

Credit/Pass (50-
69%)

N (Not yet
satisfactory) (0-
49%)

Criterion Score

 

presented
persuasively
Keeps eye
contact with
audience.
Occasionally
glances at
notes or slides.
Efficient
management
of
presentation
time with
topics
reflecting their
relative
importance
Responds
accurately to
all questions
with relevant
explanations
and/or
contextualisati
on /
elaboration.
(3.5 – 4.95
points)

intermittent
eye contact.
Frequent
reliance on
notes or slides.
Uneven
presentation
to manage
time
Responds
accurately to
all questions.
Some
responses
rudimentary
(not always
clearly or
completely) or
fails to
elaborate
(2.5 – 3.45
points)

Responds to
few questions,
some
incomplete
and/or
incorrect
answers.
Rarely makes
eye contact
with audience;
reads notes or
slides.
Poor time
management.
(0 – 2.45
points)

Attempts to
persuade
Makes

audience to
consider the
speaker’s point
of view.

9/3/22, 5:19 PM Preview Rubric: Assessment 2B: Presentation – (BEO5307) Global Procurement – CT,SY – Victoria University
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1413219&rubricId=500141&originTool=quicklinks 4/5
Total / 25

Criteria
Full Marks
High
Distinction/Disti
nction (70-
100%)

Credit/Pass (50-
69%)

N (Not yet
satisfactory) (0-
49%)

Criterion Score

 

Criterion
10.4
Supporting
material
5 points

/ 5
4.3 points
Supporting
material is
informative
and reinforces
message.
Clean and
simple layout,
enhancing
communicatio
n of ideas
(3.5 – 4.95
points)

3 points
Supporting
material
relevant;
sometimes
difficult to
view/engage
with, (i.e. some
graphics or
special effects
distract)
(2.5 – 3.45
points)

1.3 points
Supporting
material is
very difficult
to view, layout
is cluttered
and confusing
(0 – 2.45
points)

Criterion
10.5
Effective,
cohesive
teamwork

/ 5
5 points
4.3 points
Functions
effectively as a
cohesive team
with some
links between
members’
contributions
Evidence of
equal
contributions
of group
members
(3.5 – 4.95
points)

3 points
Some
evidence of
team function
and /or
coordination
between
members’
contributions
Some
evidence of
reasonably
balanced
contributions
between
group
members
(2.5 – 3.45
points)

1.3 points
Limited
evidence of
coordination
between
members’
contributions
Variable
contributions
between
group
members
(0 – 2.45
points)

9/3/22, 5:19 PM Preview Rubric: Assessment 2B: Presentation – (BEO5307) Global Procurement – CT,SY – Victoria University
https://vucollaborate.vu.edu.au/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=1413219&rubricId=500141&originTool=quicklinks 5/5
Overall Score
HD
80 points minimum
P 50
points minimum
N 0
points minimum

Comments are closed.