Marking criteria

PBHD BIOS3028 Marking criteria – Case study Part 2

Criteria
Total
Marks

Use of terminology.
3
2-3
Uses appropriate
terminology throughout.
1
Occasionally uses
appropriate terminology.
0
Does not use
appropriate
terminology.

Demonstrates an
understanding of the
origin of the
treatment/therapeutic.
4
3-4
Demonstrates a clear
understanding of the
origin of the
treatment/therapeutic
2
Demonstrates an
understanding of the origin
of the treatment/therapeutic
1
Demonstrates a partial
understanding of the
origin of the
treatment/therapeutic
0
Does not demonstrate
an understanding of the
origin of the
treatment/therapeutic

Provides a clear
mechanism of action.
4
3-4
Describes a clear
mechanism of action.
2
Describes a mechanism of
action.
1
Partially describes a
mechanism of action.
0
Does not describe a
mechanism of action.

Analyse and compare
research findings.
4
3-4
High level of analysis and
comparison of research
findings.
2
Demonstrates analysis and
comparison of research
findings.
1
Weak analysis and
comparison of
research findings.
0
Does not analyse and
compare research
findings.

Writing/presentation
skills.
2
2
Great
writing/presentation
skills. Very few errors.
1
Good writing/presentation
skills. Some errors.
0
Poor
writing/presentation
skills. Numerous
errors.

Proper, relevant
referencing.
3
3
No errors in referencing.
3 or more relevant
references.
2
Some errors in referencing. 3
or more relevant references.
1
Poor referencing. <3
relevant references.
0
No referencing.

TOTAL
20