Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Marking criteria

PBHD BIOS3028 Marking criteria – Case study Part 2

Criteria
Total
Marks

Use of terminology.
3
2-3
Uses appropriate
terminology throughout.

1
Occasionally uses
appropriate terminology.

0
Does not use
appropriate
terminology.

Demonstrates an
understanding of the
origin of the
treatment/therapeutic.

4
3-4
Demonstrates a clear
understanding of the
origin of the
treatment/therapeutic

2
Demonstrates an
understanding of the origin
of the treatment/therapeutic

1
Demonstrates a partial
understanding of the
origin of the
treatment/therapeutic

0
Does not demonstrate
an understanding of the
origin of the
treatment/therapeutic

Provides a clear
mechanism of action.

4
3-4
Describes a clear
mechanism of action.

2
Describes a mechanism of
action.

1
Partially describes a
mechanism of action.

0
Does not describe a
mechanism of action.

Analyse and compare
research findings.

4
3-4
High level of analysis and
comparison of research
findings.

2
Demonstrates analysis and
comparison of research
findings.

1
Weak analysis and
comparison of
research findings.

0
Does not analyse and
compare research
findings.

Writing/presentation
skills.

2
2
Great
writing/presentation
skills. Very few errors.

1
Good writing/presentation
skills. Some errors.

0
Poor
writing/presentation
skills. Numerous
errors.

Proper, relevant
referencing.

3
3
No errors in referencing.
3 or more relevant
references.

2
Some errors in referencing. 3
or more relevant references.

1
Poor referencing. <3
relevant references.

0
No referencing.

TOTAL
20

 

Comments are closed.

GET FREE HOMEWORK HELP TODAY

X
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
? Hi, how can I help?
Scroll to Top