According to the theory of ethical relativism, there are “no…

According to the theory of ethical relativism, there are “no universal moral standards” (Velasquez, Andre, Shanks, S.J. & Meyer 1992). In other words, right and wrong are subjective and often dependent upon cultural norms – we cannot view another culture’s ethics through our own cultural framework.
– In your opinion, is the theory of Ethical Relativism valid?
-Why or why not? This question is NOT about whether there are different ethics in different cultures; there are.
The question here is, do universal moral standards exist? Or is Ethical Relativism a valid theory? Please focus on differences between cultures and not individuals.

1. Briefly define Ethical Relativism in your own words.
No Quotations!
ONLY the definition in your own words will be marked. A quotation only will receive a zero on this section.
2. Then, write a persuasively explaining and defending your opinion about the theory’s validity.
-Use specific real-life examples in your argument either from personal experience, studies or a recent media article.

To support your answers, provide a minimum of 2 references in APA format from relevant research.

HINT:
Ethical Relativism does NOT just mean different cultures have different ethics. We all know there are different ethics in different cultures. If you only provide examples saying there are different ethics in different cultures, you will not be addressing the theory or the questions.
Please make sure to understand what Ethical Relativism really means and answer the questions above.

The post According to the theory of ethical relativism, there are “no… first appeared on Bessays.